Kushmaro warns against treating 2026 vote as historically unique
The commentator argues that labeling the election as existential risks hardening the post-election divide between the two political blocs.
By Elijah Fitzgerald ·

Danny Kushmaro opens his nightly election segment by declaring the upcoming vote the most fateful in Israeli history. He joins a chorus of commentators using similar language, a refrain that has defined this campaign cycle. Kushmaro argues that this specific framing creates a dangerous dynamic for the country's political stability.
The core conflict lies in how voters and leaders interpret the stakes. Describing the ballot as uniquely important transforms standard political competition into an existential battle. This shifts the contest between the pro-Netanyahu and anti-Netanyahu blocs from a routine change of power to a matter of national survival.
Kushmaro notes that every election feels momentous to the participants at the time. However, historical perspective suggests the current vote is not more fateful than those that preceded it. He warns against the romanticized assumption that the present moment is fundamentally different from the past.
The practical consequence of this rhetoric is a harder time accepting defeat. When a loss is framed as a catastrophic event the country cannot survive, the losing side finds it difficult to view the result as a temporary setback. This makes an orderly transfer of power more challenging.
This struggle over legitimacy has defined Israeli politics since Naftali Bennett formed his government in 2021. Even before the new cabinet was sworn in, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu labeled the formation the greatest election fraud. Although he referred to broken campaign promises rather than stolen ballots, the language cast the legitimate parliamentary process as flawed.
The opposition spent the duration of Bennett's government working to dismantle it. In the Knesset, the coalition's slim majority meant every vote carried weight. Likud MK Miri Regev explained in 2022 recordings that voting against measures benefiting soldiers and vulnerable groups was a strategic move to topple the coalition.
After Netanyahu won the 2022 election, the roles reversed. Yair Lapid conceded the result and arranged a handover. Yet, as protests against the judicial overhaul grew in 2023, questions of legitimacy resurfaced. Former Shin Bet director Yuval Diskin told a massive demonstration in Tel Aviv in April 2023 that while the government was legally elected, it was morally illegitimate due to its composition and actions.
More Politics · World news · Report a business · Got a Story?





