Tennessee Halts Executions After Experts Call Failed Injection Malpractice
New court filings reveal a 10-needle struggle and a baby-sized catheter used in Christa Pike's survival.
By Elijah Fitzgerald ·

Medical experts declared the failed lethal injection of Christa Pike a textbook case of malpractice on Thursday, citing a chaotic hour-long struggle to insert an IV line. The Tennessee death row inmate survived a standard fatal dose of pentobarbital after the execution team used equipment they described as too small for the task. Legal filings released in court proceedings detail the specific failures that allowed Pike to survive the state's final penalty.
Pike was sentenced to death in 1995 for the murder of her classmate, Colleen Slemmer. Her lawyer, Randy Spivey, filed a witness account of the September 30 execution attempt. Spivey described four unidentified team members struggling to secure a vein in Pike's arms for nearly 60 minutes. The team used approximately 10 needles during the process, repeatedly puncturing her skin without establishing a stable line.
At 7:05 p.m., about half an hour into the procedure, a team member requested a 24-gauge needle. Jonathan Groner, an emeritus professor of clinical surgery at Ohio State University, noted that this gauge is typically reserved for infants or small children. Joel Zivot, a professor of anesthesiology and surgery in Atlanta who provided expert testimony, stated that pushing 50cc of pentobarbital through such a small catheter would inevitably blow the vein. At 7:07 p.m., a team member confirmed the suspicion, stating, "I think it is blown."
The team attempted to locate a viable vein using ultrasound, a technique Groner said requires extensive specialist training. He observed that the team did not appear to know how to operate the equipment properly. At 7:23 p.m., saline was pushed through the line with difficulty, a sign Groner described as a flashing red light. One minute later, the team concluded the IV was set and proceeded with the injection despite the resistance.
Pike grimaced several times during the procedure and reported that her arm was "really burning." Groner pointed out that protocol dictates stopping the infusion immediately if a patient complains of pain. Zivot listed several critical failings, including a poorly written protocol, a lack of clear command, and the use of technology the team may not have been authorized to employ. He argued that the team should have halted the process when the initial line failed.
Following the failed attempt, Pike spent ten days in a hospital setting. She required a ventilator for several days, and her legal team initially assumed she was brain-dead. She has since returned to her prison cell and can now talk and walk, though her long-term medical prognosis remains uncertain. Her lawyers had warned the state multiple times before the execution that her veins were exceptionally small and compromised.
Tennessee has suspended all executions pending a review of its procedures. The state's decision follows the release of Spivey's detailed chronology and the expert opinions provided by Groner and Zivot. Both physicians argued that the incident exposes fundamental flaws in lethal injection, the primary method of execution in the United States. Groner described the process as a "medical charade," while Zivot emphasized that the team lacked the safety and accountability standards expected in modern medicine.





